Call 0867227014, 0318115749 or WhatsApp 0825507946 for more detail!

elearning

Assessor Course online – the Scam

Assessor course online, ETDP SETA Accredited

Is Your E-Learning or Distance Learning Training Provider Accredited?

High-quality education can be very expensive, time-consuming and challenging.  Nothing is more disappointing than discovering that a certificate or qualification isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.

Luckily, there is useful information on how to prevent getting defrauded — as commonly happens with e-learning and distance learning providers, especially on the ODETDP Qualification unit standards like Train the Trainer, Assessor, Moderator and SDF.

It’s important to keep in mind that e-learning, distance learning or CD learning isn’t the same thing as classroom learning.  Furthermore, a service provider who is authorized to provide classroom learning isn’t authorised to provide e-learning or CD correspondence training.  Are there currently Training Providers with the ETDP SETA that have approval to offer courses via e-Learning or Distance Learning?

We would strongly recommend that each learner take extra precaution to confirm if his or her Training Provider has scope to offer his course through eLearning or Distance Learning. You could be fallen for a scam!

Report these SCAMS to your SETA. SAQA or the QCTO like the Assessors Course Online.

Keep this in mind as you confirm the training provider’s accreditation, scope and method.

ACCREDITATION

Each Training Provider should mention the following on his or her website, course material or advertising material:

  • Accreditation Number.
  • The SETAs name he or she is accredited with.

You may want to contact the concerned SETA and confirm the accreditation with them in person.  You can also check with the SETA for any appeals or complaints against the provider, or for any reviews on the Training Provider.  You may even consider contacting previous learners for a review.

SCOPE

Training Provider Accreditation and Programme Accreditation (approval) are different things.  It’s advisable to check that the actual programme was approved by the relevant SETA.  The SETA and the training provider should each have a copy of the programme accreditation letter to confirm its dates are still valid.  All 21 SETAs should provide this service.  The unit standard numbers, NQF level and Credits should also appear on the course detail.

CONFIRM THE METHOD OF DELIVERY WAS APPROVED like the Assessors Course Online

The method of delivery is how the training provider is allowed to deliver the programme.

By default, a Training Provider is only allowed to deliver the course using the traditional methods — that is, through classroom contact session.

Any Training Provider who offers a course by any other means such as distance learning, e-learning, correspondence via post, CD, Skype or conference learning must have a special approval letter to do so.  This special approval letter should be producible by the Training Provider (on his website, for example) and also verifiable with the relevant SETA.

What questions you should ask before enrolling for a course:

  • Confirm with the relevant SETA (any of the 21) that the Training Provider is accredited.
  • Confirm with the relevant SETA (any of the 21) that the programme is accredited with this training provider, and still valid.
  • If the method of delivery is different from classroom, the training provider should be able to produce the special approval letter from the SETA.
  • Ask about hidden fees such as: Assessment, Re-Assessment, Support or Registration fees.
  • What is the duration of the course? How long do you have to submit your assignments?
  • Request references — previous clients that you can contact.

TRAINYOUCAN  strive for 100% compliance with the SETAs, SAQA and the NQF act.

QCTO Policy on qualification development facilitators

1. POLICY STATEMENT

1.1 The purpose of this policy is to outline the functions of and requirements for
Qualification Development Facilitators.
1.2 This policy shall apply to those aspiring to register as Qualification Development
Facilitators (QDFs) as well as to those already registered as QDFs.

2. ObJECTIVES OF THE QDF POLICY

2.1 This policy formalizes the work of Qualification Development Facilitators (QDFs)
and aligns it to the overall objectives and other policies of the QCTO.
2.2 This policy aims to ensure that through the QDFs role quality qualifications are designed.

3. PRINCIPLES FOR QDF

3.1 QDFs and learner QDFs must commit to honouring the principles to which the
QCTO itself is committed as listed below: (a) Innovation and excellence;
(b) Empowerment and recognition; (c) Respect and dignity;
(d) Ethics and integrity;
(e) Ownership and accountability; (f ) Authenticity;
3.2 QDFs and learner QDFs must signal this commitment by signing a Code of
Conduct, attached to as Annexure A.
3.3 The enhancement of equity is a fundamental principle of the QCTO and will be actively promoted.

4. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

4.1 The Policy on QDFs is developed and guided by the following: (a) National Qualifications Framework Act (Act 67 of 2008);
(b) Skills Development Act (Act 97 of 1998 as amended in 2008);
(c) The sub framework for Trades and Occupations, (once approved by the
Minister of Higher Education and Training);

(d) The QCTO Curriculum and Assessment Policy;
(e) The QCTO Policy on Delegation of Qualifications Design and Assessment to
DQPs and AQPs;
5. FUNCTIONS OF A QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATOR
5.1 The Qualification Development Facilitator (QDF ) may in accordance with QCTO
model:
(a) Facilitate the process of obtaining an agreement on the occupational qualification scope.
5.2 The Qualification Development Facilitator (QDF ) must in accordance with QCTO
model:
(a) Facilitate the development of occupational qualifications using QCTO qualification development processes leading to the development of an occupational profile; knowledge, practical and work experience curricula and assessment specifications ;
(b) Conduct occupationally relevant research to enhance the quality of the occupational qualification developed;
(c) Capture inputs developed under (a) onto the prescribed QCTO qualifications development IT system;
(d) Deliver, in the QCTO format, the following four documents per occupational qualification to the DQP:
i. Qualification document;
ii. Curriculum document;
iii. Assessment specifications document;
iv. Process report;
(e) Train and mentor learner Qualification Development Facilitator/s on the occupational qualification development process, if assigned to by the QCTO through an SLA with the DQP.

6. CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF APPLICATIONS TO REGISTER AS A QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATOR

6.1 The criteria for evaluation of applications to register as Qualification Development
Facilitator are :
(a) An applicant must have participated as a learner Qualification Development
Facilitator appointed through the SLA process;
(b) An applicant must have successfully completed QCTO’s training for
Qualification Development Facilitators;
(c) An applicant as a learner QDF must have developed all documents as stipulated under 5.2(d) and the said documents must have been accepted by QCTO as meeting the required standards;
(d) An applicant learner QDF must have a recommendation for registration from the mentor QDF.

7. APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATOR

7.1 A person applying to be registered as a Qualification Development Facilitator
must submit a completed application form (Attached hereto as Annexure B) to the
QCTO.
7.2 Upon receipt of all required documentation specified in the registration criteria, the QCTO will evaluate the application:
7.2.1 If approved, the applicant will proceed to registration.
7.2.2 If not approved, the QCTO must provide reasons for its decision in writing.
7.3 Where a candidate is not approved , they may:
7.3.1 re-apply once they have facilitated a further qualification development process as a learner.
7.3.2 appeal to the QCTO Appeals Committee if they believe the evaluation was not fair.

8. REGISTRATION OF QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATOR

8.1 Qualification Development Facilitators approved by the QCTO must sign the QCTO Code of Conduct attached hereto as Annexure A.

8.2 The QCTO will register approved Qualification Development Facilitators onto the
QCTO database on receipt of a signed code of conduct.
8.3 Registered QDFs will be required to remain up to date with changes to the QCTO
facilitation model effected over time.

9. CHARGING OF FEES bY THE QCTO

9.1 The QCTO may charge fees for :
(a) registration of qualifications development facilitators;
(b) any other fees as the QCTO, after consultation, determines.

10. DE-REGISTRATION OF QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATOR

10.1 The QCTO may terminate the registration of a Qualification Development
Facilitator (QDF) on reasonable grounds including on the grounds that a QDF: (a) has breached the Code of Conduct;
(b) has failed to adhere to QCTO quality standards despite remedial intervention.

11. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

11.1 In the event of a dispute arising out of this policy, the parties must endeavor to negotiate in good faith with a view to settling the dispute amicably.
11.2 If the negotiations fail, the dispute must be referred to the QCTO Appeals
Committee for resolution.
11.3 The QCTO Appeals Committee may determine any additional procedure needed to adjudicate the dispute in a fair manner and communicate these procedures to the parties.
11.4 The decision arrived at as a result of QCTO Appeals Committee determination is final.

12. TRANSITIONAL PERIOD

12.1 The QCTO reserves the right to waive certain conditions during the transitional period to enable implementation of this policy.

Annexure A

THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE QUALIFICATION DEVELOPMENT FACILITATORS

We, the undersigned, hereby commit ourselves to abide by the QCTO’s Code of Conduct in relation to all our work. The Code of Conduct to which we agree is as follows:
1.1 promoting the objectives of the NQF
1.2 dealing fairly, professionally and equitably with stakeholders whilst accelerating the redress of past unfair discrimination.
1.3 consulting with all relevant stakeholders that have an interest in the development and assessment of occupational qualifications and sharing of best practice.
1.4 executing our responsibilities and accountabilities timeously and with due regard to the accountability to our constituents that we are committed to serve.
1.5 seeking at all times to create a positive environment for the development and assessment process and respect the historical diversity of learners’ cultural, linguistic and educational backgrounds.
1.6 declaring conflict of interest that infringe on the execution of our delegated responsibilities.
1.7 recusing ourselves from any decision-making process which may result in improper personal gain that will impact negatively on the values cherished by the QCTO.
1.8 recognising the public’s rights of access to information, excluding information that is specifically protected by the law.
1.9 acting in a manner that will respect, promote and protect the goodwill and reputation of occupational qualification family.

E-Learning or Distance Learning SCAMS

Is Your E-Learning or Distance Learning Training Provider Accredited?

High-quality education can be very expensive, time-consuming and challenging.  Nothing is more disappointing than discovering that a certificate or qualification isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. Recently some countries even reported that teachers with qualifications from distance learning institutions such as Unisa and web universities are no longer allowed for employment.

DOWNLOAD THE NOTICE FROM THE ETDP SETA HERE

Luckily, there is useful information on how to prevent getting defrauded — as commonly happens with e-learning and distance learning providers, especially on the ODETDP Qualification unit standards like Train the Trainer, Assessor, Moderator and SDF.

It’s important to keep in mind that e-learning, distance learning or CD learning isn’t the same thing as classroom learning.  Furthermore, a service provider who is authorized to provide classroom learning isn’t authorised to provide e-learning or CD correspondence training.  Are there currently Training Providers with the ETDP SETA that have approval to offer courses via e-Learning or Distance Learning?

We would strongly recommend that each learner take extra precaution to confirm if his or her Training Provider has scope to offer his course through eLearning or Distance Learning. You could be fallen for a scam!

Report these SCAMS to your SETA. SAQA or the QCTO.

Keep this in mind as you confirm the training provider’s accreditation, scope and method.

ACCREDITATION

Each Training Provider should mention the following on his or her website, course material or advertising material:

  • Accreditation Number.
  • The SETAs name he or she is accredited with.

You may want to contact the concerned SETA and confirm the accreditation with them in person.  You can also check with the SETA for any appeals or complaints against the provider, or for any reviews on the Training Provider.  You may even consider contacting previous learners for a review.

SCOPE

Training Provider Accreditation and Programme Accreditation (approval) are different things.  It’s advisable to check that the actual programme was approved by the relevant SETA.  The SETA and the training provider should each have a copy of the programme accreditation letter to confirm its dates are still valid.  All 21 SETAs should provide this service.  The unit standard numbers, NQF level and Credits should also appear on the course detail.

CONFIRM THE METHOD OF DELIVERY WAS APPROVED

The method of delivery is how the training provider is allowed to deliver the programme.

By default, a Training Provider is only allowed to deliver the course using the traditional methods — that is, through classroom contact session.

Any Training Provider who offers a course by any other means such as distance learning, e-learning, correspondence via post, CD, Skype or conference learning must have a special approval letter to do so.  This special approval letter should be producible by the Training Provider (on his website, for example) and also verifiable with the relevant SETA.

What questions you should ask before enrolling for a course:

  • Confirm with the relevant SETA (any of the 21) that the Training Provider is accredited.
  • Confirm with the relevant SETA (any of the 21) that the programme is accredited with this training provider, and still valid.
  • If the method of delivery is different from classroom, the training provider should be able to produce the special approval letter from the SETA.
  • Ask about hidden fees such as: Assessment, Re-Assessment, Support or Registration fees.
  • What is the duration of the course? How long do you have to submit your assignments?
  • Request references — previous clients that you can contact.

TRAINYOUCAN  strive for 100% compliance with the SETAs, SAQA and the NQF act.


CONFIRMATION RECEIVED FROM ETDP SETA – 26th of September 2016

From: Mahomed Sader
Sent: 26 September 2016 12:23 PM
To: Mahomed Sader; Ezra S – TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network; Mohamed.B@qcto.org.za
Cc: Nkhensani Mabunda; Herman Letoka; Maswazi Tshabalala
Subject: Mode of Delivery

Respected Skills Development Provider

The ETDP SETA receives many complaints and queries from Skills Development Providers about the modes of delivery of training programmes by competitor providers. The ETDP SETA wishes to place on record the following:

  • All modes of delivery are encouraged to reach as wide as possible and as many learners as possible.
  • Innovation in terms of modes of delivery such as eLearning, Distance Learning, video facilitation, Skype etc etc are encouraged.
  • Innovation in terms of Port Folios of evidence be it hard Cope or ePOE etc etc are encouraged.
  • Innovation in ensuring that the workplace learning is adequately accommodated.

The key issues for the ETDP SETA are that:

  • Only accredited Skills Development providers offer training and must emphasise that providers applying for accreditation may not offer any training until deemed accredited.
  • The ETDP SETA has to be satisfied that the mode of delivery adopted meets the qualification stipulations and I am loathe to go into issues of VARCS and the core criteria used for accreditation as providers should be aware of the issues.
  • The ETDP SETA will only quality assure qualifications and unit standards that are classified under Field 005
  • The ETDP SETA at external moderation will find great difficulty in endorsing learning programmes and especially modes of delivery that have not been pre-sanctioned.
  • To date only one provider has been accredited/granted permission to use an eLearning platform.
  • To date I have not seen any letters awarding distance education accreditation.

I trust that this email clarifies the issues at hand. Please feel free to write to me in the event that you require specific clarity in terms of your modes of delivery.